{"id":419,"date":"2010-11-30T20:42:18","date_gmt":"2010-11-30T18:42:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ourblog.greenwoods.org\/?p=419"},"modified":"2010-11-30T20:42:18","modified_gmt":"2010-11-30T18:42:18","slug":"incoterms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/incoterms\/","title":{"rendered":"Incoterms"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>International sales contracts: new Incoterms in effect 1st January 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n

Export transactions generally involve international sales contracts, whose clarity of terms is crucial to avoiding disputes between parties. To ensure consistent interpretation, the International Chamber of Commerce created a set of standard trade “Incoterms”<\/em> in 1936, whose terms are periodically revised to reflect developments in international trade.<\/p>\n

On January 1, 2011, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)’s Incoterms 2010 will replace Incoterms 2000 as the authoritative text for determining the allocation of risks and responsibilities in the sale of goods.<\/p>\n

Major Changes You Should Know About <\/strong><\/p>\n

New Rules and Deleted Rules<\/strong><\/p>\n

Incoterms 2010 includes two new rules, Delivered at Terminal (DAT) and Delivered at Place (DAP), and eliminates the Delivered at Frontier (DAF), Delivered Ex-Ship (DES), Delivered Ex-Quay (DEQ) and Delivered Duty Unpaid (DDU) designations. DAT replaces the current DEQ, while DAP replaces DAF, DES and DDU. This reduces the number of formal terms from 13 to 11.<\/em><\/p>\n

The new DAT and DAP rules should help to simplify issues pertaining to the time and place at which risks are transferred. Under the new DAT rule, the seller bears all the risks involved in the movement of the goods until they are delivered. Goods will be considered delivered when they are unloaded at a named terminal and placed at the disposal of the buyer. The seller also has the responsibility to clear the goods for export, but does not have the obligation to deal with import duties or other formalities.<\/p>\n

Under DAP, the seller retains all the risks involved in the movement of the goods until they are delivered, but, unlike DAT, the unloading of the goods from the arriving means of transport is the responsibility of the buyer. Thus, the goods are considered delivered when they reach the named place and are ready for unloading by the buyer. Like DAT, the seller is responsible for export clearance but is not responsible for import clearance.<\/p>\n

Rule Classification<\/strong><\/p>\n

Under previous Incoterms revisions, terms were grouped in order of increasing responsibility on the seller. The rules in Incoterms 2010 are grouped according to the mode of transport as follows:<\/p>\n

ALL MODES OF TRANSPORTATION:<\/p>\n

EXW: Ex Works<\/p>\n

FCA: Free Carrier<\/p>\n

CPT: Carriage Paid To<\/p>\n

CIP: Carriage and Insurance Paid<\/p>\n

DAT: Delivered At Terminal<\/p>\n

DAP: Delivered At Place<\/p>\n

DDP: Delivered Duty Paid<\/p>\n

SEA AND INLAND WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION:<\/p>\n

FAS: Free Alongside Ship<\/p>\n

FOB: Free On Board<\/p>\n

CFR: Cost and Freight<\/p>\n

CIF: Cost, Insurance, and Freight<\/p>\n

The first class of terms can be used for any mode of transport – including cases where a ship is used for part of the carriage. The second class of terms relates to cases where goods are carried to and from ports.<\/p>\n

It is also worth noting that the concept of “ship’s rail” has been replaced with “on board.” Thus, for FOB, CFR and CIF sales, goods are deemed delivered when they are on board the vessel. This eliminates past concerns of risk passing arbitrarily back and forth between the buyer and seller across an invisible line extending upward from the ship’s rail.<\/p>\n

Insurance Markets <\/strong>Incoterms 2010 also takes into consideration the 2009 adoption by insurance markets of the Revised Institute Cargo Clauses (LMA\/IUA) (2009).<\/em> However, the evidence of insurance requirements that must be provided to the buyer is only applicable where CIP and CIF terms are used, and these terms generally follow the current requirements under Incoterms 2000.<\/p>\n

Other Features <\/strong>Given heightened security concerns internationally, Incoterms 2010 adds clauses relating to security clearances and the information required for such clearances. These rules apportion obligations between buyer and seller. For instance, under the term EXW, the seller must provide timely security-related information about the goods required by the buyer for import, export or transport purposes.<\/p>\n

Finally, Incoterms 2010 also accounts for newer modes of global electronic communications by extending to electronic means of communication the same effect as paper communication.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

With a greater trend towards using Incoterms for purely domestic sales contracts, particularly in the United States, Incoterms 2010 expressly recognizes that the rules are available for both domestic and international sales contracts. However, in both domestic and international contracts, the value of the rules depends mainly on the parties selecting and incorporating into the sales contract the Incoterms that accurately reflect their common intentions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

International sales contracts: new Incoterms in effect 1st January 2011 Export transactions generally involve international sales contracts, whose clarity of terms is crucial to avoiding disputes between parties. To ensure consistent interpretation, the International Chamber of Commerce created a set of standard trade “Incoterms” in 1936, whose terms are periodically revised to reflect developments in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/419"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=419"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/419\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greenwoods.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}